It sounds to me like you're a lot more worried about the VRAM than you are about slightly reduced rasterization/ray-tracing performance, so I think you'll be better off with a 6800 XT. So your choice is between 16 GB of VRAM (6800 XT) vs better ray tracing, DLSS (or not), and slightly better performance (RTX 3080). The game has performance and other problems, which they will figure out, and when they do that, they will 'gladly look at the possiblities of adding rtx' or whatever their statement said. They actually didnt say its not coming, just not yet. It is because of MSFS (which I play) and the 10 GB of VRAM that it uses that I'm holding out for the RTX 3080 Ti/Super and the 20 GB of VRAM its rumored to ship with, but the difference between you and me is that I'm playing MSFS, I'm doing it at 4K, and I'm willing to pay extra for a RTX 3080 Ti/Super. Originally posted by Kosmozuikis: Because theres no RTX and there wont be. You should read this article: They praise the performance and quality of DLSS 2.0 in Control when using the quality setting (which renders internally at 1706x960) the output is actually very good and is definitely worth using.Ībout the VRAM, MSFS is a very specific example: it is designed with future hardware in mind, pushing the best GPUs and CPUs of today to their limits.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |